I would never have chosen this book because I’m not crazy about Greene and his anxiety over Catholic righteousness. Oh well – this one is supposed to be pretty good and it was re-released in 2011, a good sign.
The Heart of the Matter
by Graham Greene
1948 / 288 pages
read by Michael Kitchen 10h 6m
rating: 8 / classic – an extra point for being a classic
Major Henry Scobie is a police commissioner working in somewhere in West Africa circa WWII. He likes it there, likes his job, and loves his wife, Louise. He should be a happy man, right? Wrong – Louise is not happy at all – she feels she has no friends and wants to go to South Africa. Scobie feels it’s his responsibility to make her happy. The only child of the couple died a few years prior and Scobie feels a lot of guilt as well as self-pity.
Why Sierra Leon or the Ivory Coast or wherever? It’s not for the scenery or the population because there’s almost nothing about that sort of thing – just enough to know it’s a distant land with a hugely varied population. More likely the novel is set there to give a slight distancing to the whole situation and more sympathy for the protagonist . He’s a police officer, alone in a war zone distant from home. Scobie’s first transgression, against his job, involves a clemency, a mercy to a deserving suspect.
But he has embarked on a slippery slope – his wife gets to leave with the help of an ill advised loan. Then he meets a devastated young widow who needs him and well – he’s just trying to help – poor, sad man.
Also, Africa gives the protagonist access to illicit funds, smuggled diamonds, a man from another culture with different values who will “understand” and help – I suppose with some thought this could mostly have been achieved in London – only the distancing would be missing. Because of that distancing we’re better able to understand that Scobie is a very good man who is in a strange and lonely place where he feels unappreciated at work and unloved by his wife. Furthermore he has none of the resources he would have in London – old friends, family, activities. He becomes sympathetic in a way he would not have been in the city.
Major Scobie is a good Catholic man – he wants always to do the right thing which he interprets as being in the good graces of the Church. He doesn’t lie, steal, cheat, commit adultery or any number of other things. He’s very proud of his “goodness” and sticks to it. He goes to mass and has a very legalistic view of religion. But! he does little things like tearing up letters from suspicious persons when he finds they’re innocuous – this is against regulations and Scobie tries to follow the laws and regulations of the government and the injunctions of the Church.
Scobie’s depressed wife Louise really, really wants to go to South Africa. So Scobie has to find the money and he accepts a loan from this disreputable man who deals in illicit diamonds. Then he does something else akin to lying. Then he … well .. yes. He errs in many ways and struggles with his choices – or lack of them. And then he starts really feeling sorry for himself and wonders if everyone feels pity for him – that pretty well tears at his pride. Scobie is a very proud man – hasn’t thought he needed forgiveness because has committed no sins – until now – and he can’t face himself, face those he’s hurt, face his God. It’s depressing –
Pity seems to be Scobie’s whole concept of love – he feels sorry for his wife, sorry for the man with the letter, sorry for the young widow – he mostly feels sorry for himself.
“The character of Scobie was intended to show that pity can be the expression of an almost monstrous pride.” Greene in the Introduction to the novel.
Greene writes very nicely with interesting metaphors and believable characters in psychological torment. Still, I’m really rather bored with his issues of existential despair played out against the backdrop of Church regulations and commandments. He’s searching for a meaningful life and for love but can’t let go of the need for Church approval. Where is one to find meaning? –
I’ve now read three of Graham’s books saying the same thing in different shells – The Power and the Glory (Mexico 1930s, pub 1940), The End of the Affair (1951 – London Blitz of 1940 – pub 1951) – and this one (Africa WWII – pub 1948). – Some poor man trying to be a good Catholic is trying to align his human passions (lust) with the Church and/or state in addition to other women, etc. The protagonist struggles with this and always feels guilty and overwhelmed with disgust and self-pity because of illicit love – but he can’t stop himself from loving – which is what he really thinks the rules are requiring. – What kind of a God would condemn a man for loving? –
I think this message probably had a lot more impact in 1950, when it was perceived as being truly realistic considering the high moral standards of the Church at the time, than it does now – after the 2nd Vatican of 1965. I doubt men and women these days worry too much about Church condemnation as a result of adultery – they tend to feel guilty for breaking the trust of their partner – for hurting the other party. They were angry that divorced folks are not able to take communion (until very recently). The Church has become a bit obsolete for most folks as a result of archaic prohibitions on birth control, divorce, etc.
Fwiw, these three books pretty much follow Graham’s own life – he was stationed in Sierra Leon, was a womanizer, converted to Catholicism for his second wife and then later reverted to some kind of agnostic/atheism, etc when he left her for yet another woman.
And as a kind of aside – I also read Travels with my Aunt which was hilarious but it was first published in 1969 and I read it in the early 1970s so it was timely.
A more recent and positive review:
LA Review of Books – 2012:
A Psychoanalytic Reading (PDF – University of Arad, Romania)